Greg Smith and Associates, Criminal Defense Attorneys/
Salt Lake City (Murray)
Free 15 Min. Consultation  :  Nights & Weekends  :  Easy Payments

801-651-1512  -  24/7

Free 15 Min. Consultation 24/7


Feedback From Satisfied Clients

"The domestic violence and DUI crimes that I was charged with would have ruined my career. Thank you for saving me! You are worth every penny I paid you."

More Testimonials

Avvo Clients' Choice Award. 5 Stars Reviews

Matindale Hubble Client Champion Lawyers 2018

Google Reviews

   Review Us On Google

Can I get a DUI in Utah from taking prescription drugs?

A DUI can be easy to get, even when the breath test only shows some prescription medication.

Let’s take the hypothetical case of Patty, which is very similar to one that the Utah Court of Appeals just ruled on.

Here are the essential "facts" of the case:

  1. A cop noticed Patty was driving slowly, and felt she was "creating a traffic hazard for vehicles that had to drive around it."

  2. Betty had her hazard lights on. The cop tried to pull her over, but for a while, Betty continued to drive, and she even failed to pull over after the cop put on his lights and siren.

  3. She avoided eye contact with the officer when he approached her, so he thought she may be guilty of a DUI.

  4. The cop "had nearly ten years of experience with the Utah Highway Patrol and had completed his standardized field sobriety instructor certification as well as his drug recognition expert (DRE) certification, although his DRE certification was no longer current. Based on his training and experience, he understood that "it is common with people that are under the influence of ... alcohol or drugs [to be] so focused on staying in their lane or what's right ahead of them, that they really don’t know what's going on around them."

  5. At one point, he moved his car in front of hers, and beckoned her to pull over.

  6. Betty moved over one lane but did not stop driving, which perplexed the cop.

  7. The cop again tried to get Betty’s attention.

  8. She finally stopped, so he knocked on her window.

  9. The cop had his gun drawn, having no idea if the driver was dangerous, and he handcuffed her.

  10. Betty said she had not seen the cop, and that she did not think she needed to stop.

  11. Betty seemed dazed and had droopy eyes. Betty said she had taken some medication including Tramadol, a central nervous system depressant with effects similar to alcohol.

  12. Based on this, and also based on Betty’s "intent focus straight ahead, which the cop said is common with people that are under the influence," the officer was concerned about her ability to drive and consequently began a DUI investigation.

  13. The cop then gave Betty three tests: 1) the horizontal gaze nystagmus test – also called the “pen test,” 2) the nine-step walk-and-turn, 3) and the one-leg stand.

  14. Based on all the "clues" he got from this test, the cop felt Betty was under the influence of alcohol.

  15. To complicate things, Betty said she had had brain surgery, so the cop checked her eyes for abnormalities, but didn’t find any. "Her pupils were the same size, they were tracking equally, and there was no resting eye nystagmus." Betty denied having any other injury that could impair her ability to perform the tests, such as back, knee, or ankle problems.

  16. The cop noticed "there was a lack of smooth pursuit" in both of Betty’s eyes, which for the cop were "two clues," and found two more clues during this test, for a total of four clues from the eye test.

  17. Thus, the cop felt those four clues showed she was under the influence.

  18. Betty then took the "nine-step walk-and-turn test."

  19. The cop said that test gave him six more clues ("failing to maintain balance during the instruction phase of the test, missing heel to toe several times, stepping off the line several times, taking the wrong number of steps the first time, taking the wrong number of steps the second time, and performing an improper turn").

  20. Betty then did "the one-leg stand." The cop got two more clues from that (Betty put her foot down twice and seems to sway back and forth during the test).

  21. Betty spoke Spanish, but never said she did not understand the cop, and the cop didn’t feel there was any significant language barrier.

  22. Now, here is the kicker.

  23. The cop gave Betty a breath test, which showed that she had not drunk any alcohol. But, because of his training and experience, he still thought she was impaired by something. A later test showed there was Tramadol in her body.

  24. Because Betty was very slow in pulling over, the cops charged her with a felony: failure to respond to an officer’s signal to stop, see Utah Code Ann. § 41-6a-210 (LexisNexis 2014), and a DUI, a class B misdemeanor, see id. § 41-6a-502.

  25. At trial, Betty argued that she was absolutely able "to safely operate [her] motor vehicle."

  26. Betty was convicted, and appealed.

  27. She claimed there was simply not enough evidence to support the guilty findings.

  28. Betty argued that "the State’s only allegation was that "she was moving slowly with hazard lights on...." And [that] this by itself is not enough."

  29. But, the judge stated, "I think there is sufficient evidence that the jury could look at it and determine that ... the facts support a finding of guilt" because "[h]er eyes were drooping" and there were "the clues that [the officer] talked about."

Now, this is important: on appeal Betty was able to show that because she squawked about what she deemed to be a lack of evidence after the prosecutor had "rested their case," the Court of Appeals was willing to hear her arguments.

NOTE: If your lawyer does not OBJECT to what happens, the wrongdoing gets waived, and you typically CANNOT bring it up for the first time on appeal. In other words, you MUST give the trial judge the chance to correct any error. If you don’t, the Court of Appeals may say, "So sad, too bad." In Utah, For an issue to be preserved, it "must be specifically raised, in a timely manner, and must be supported by evidence and relevant legal authority." State v. Oliver, 2018 UT App 101, ¶ 13, 427 P.3d 495

But, the Court upheld the convictions.

Tags: DUI, drunk driving, criminal defense

Feedback From Satisfied Clients

"The domestic violence and DUI crimes that I was charged with would have ruined my career. Thank you for saving me! You are worth every penny I paid you."

More Testimonials

Avvo Clients' Choice Award. 5 Stars Reviews

Matindale Hubble Client Champion Lawyers 2018

Google Reviews

   Review Us On Google

Clients with disabilities or impairments
Access to our office is available to clients and their family members at all times. Special equipment and communication devices are available upon request for our clients with visual, hearing, speech and physical impairment. In addition, arrangements can be made for verbal or sign language interpreters if needed to communicate between our attorneys and the client and family. Please notify our law office if any additional accommodations related to your disability or impairment are necessary to make your consultation more comfortable.

Greg Smith and Associates
111 E. 5600 S. #105
Murray, UT 84107

Salt Lake City, UT


Typically No Retainer - Easy Payments. *Call for details.

Greg Smith and Associates, Criminal Law Attorneys, represent clients in Salt Lake City (SLC) and all throughout the state of Utah.

DISCLAIMER: I understand that I am contacting a corporation, not an individual, and that if I do business with the law firm, it will be with that corporation, not any individual(s). I understand that Greg Smith and Associates is not the legal name of the law firm, rather, it is "Aafordable Legal Advocates, PC." I also understand that whatever may relate to, or arise out of, any communication with the law firm, which results in any type of legal action, such must be brought in the Third District Court of Utah, West Jordan Department, and that this is mandatory not permissive.

© 2020 by Greg Smith and Associates. All rights reserved.     Disclaimer  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Policy


The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

The user and reader of this information should beware because although we strive to keep the information timely and accurate, there will often be a delay between official publication of the materials and their appearance in or modification of this system, and every case must be looked at individually. Thus, we make no express or implied guarantees that the information on this site is correct, and it should not be relied upon. The Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations remain the official sources for regulatory information published by the Department of Labor, and before you do anything, you should consult an attorney, who can review the specifics of your matter. We will make every effort to correct errors brought to our attention, but laws and regulations are constantly changing, and we may at times even misinterpret them.