Jump to Navigation

Salt Lake City Criminal Law Blog

Utah Refinery Fined $1 Million, Could Criminal Charges Follow?

The Silver Eagle Refinery in Woods Cross, Utah has been fined more than $1 million for safety violations cited after two separate explosions in 2009. The company's total fines amount to a sum five times greater than the combined total of fines for safety violations issued to all refineries in Utah over the past ten years.

The fines are based on 51 separate safety violations regarding unsafe equipment, lax safety procedures, poor record-keeping, unsafe building structure, vehicular access and failure to correct faulty pressure-relief valves as mandated by the Utah Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Silver Eagle Refining Inc. was aware of 16 of the violations previous to the more serious of the two explosions that took place in November of 2009 yet made no move to correct the safety measures. These 16 violations are considered "willful" and another 34 violations were deemed as "serious" by the UOSHA.

Between the two explosions in 2009, four workers were severely injured at more than 100 neighboring houses were seriously damaged.

The Silver Eagle Refinery is the smallest of five refineries in Utah and processes 10,250 barrels of crude oil a day when the refinery is in full operation. However, the refinery shut down for two months after the explosions and has since reopened only one of its four processing units. The refinery now only processes about 4,000 barrels of crude oil per day.

Company spokeswoman Cindy Gubler states the company is currently sifting through 153 pages of citations and deciding which fines they will pay and which citations they will contest.

The company could potentially face criminal charges from the injured employees under Title 34A of the Utah Labor Code. Section 6-201 states an employer's duties:

· "each employer shall furnish each of the employer's employees employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or physical harm..."

According to documentation from the UOSHA, since 16 of the 51 violations were made aware to the company previous to the explosion, they could be considered criminal beyond negligence.

Owners of damaged property have filed 290 claims to the company's main insurer, which has paid out the company's limit of $1 million for the claims. Neighbors are extremely concerned that proper safety regulations are not being enforced and many spoke of moving from the area to ensure the safety of their families.

Like?: Mom Convicted of Harassment After Assuming Son's Identity Via Facebook

An Arkansas mother may be regretting her actions after she was convicted of harassing her son by breaking into his Facebook account and posting messages to his friends. The mother took advantage of an opportunity to monitor her son's Facebook activities when he left his account open on a laptop. She posted several messages through her son's account that disparaged him because of a recent altercation. In court, she claimed she thought she was posting through her own account. The judge didn't believe her. She now faces 30 days in jail if she violates probation and mandatory anger management and parenting courses.

At sentencing, the judge cautioned the mother about consequences of bringing private family disputes into the public sphere: "What used to be said between two people or in a parking lot, now you hit a button and hundreds, maybe millions, of people can hear what you do. It makes it maybe even more important for a person to think before they act...". Many others could heed that lesson.

State computer privacy laws have been re-booted by Utah legislators. Effective November 1, 2010, Utah laws will penalize computer hackers -- those who gain access to another's computer or networking account and those who cause damage to another's computer or networking account -- with at least a class B misdemeanor charge and up to a third-degree felony charge, depending on the amount of damage that resulted from the intrusion. Current law contains similar penalties, but has different damages amounts to trigger the increased charges.

As many consumers are learning, with new media, comes new responsibilities and privacy issues. Intrusions into a family member or loved one's e-mail, Facebook or computer accounts, even if inadvertent, may later be viewed harshly by prosecutors or judges. Contact a knowledgeable criminal defense attorney if you are being investigated for or have been charged with violation of computer privacy laws in Utah.

Utah Drug Courts: Succeeding and Closing at the Same Time

Law enforcement authorities, judges and people who have gone through the system and come out better citizens hail the successes of Utah's drug courts. Unfortunately, widespread acclaim hasn't been enough to prevent the closure of several of Utah's municipal drug courts bogged down by new reporting requirements and handcuffed by a law preventing plea agreements for DUI offenders.

KSL TV reports that the Holladay drug court has closed and the Clearfield drug court is preparing to close.

How Do Drug Courts Work?

Utah began using drug courts in the mid-1990s, offering low-level offenders an alternative to traditional punishments such as prison and hefty fines.

Drug court participants attend regular, required treatment sessions and must make court appearances and submit to random drug tests. The random tests are paid for by the offender, who must also attend therapy, pay fines and do community service.

Drug courts often recommend that participants develop skills that will help them cope successfully in the long-term with mainstream society: urging participants to increase their education levels and develop relationships with community mentors.

Evidence that Drug Courts are Effective

The U.S. Justice Department estimates that 45 percent of drug offenders who don't go through drug court wind up reoffending. Of the drug crime offenders who go to prison, 60 percent reoffend after their release from incarceration.

By contrast, a University of Utah study showed that Utah drug court graduates have a recidivism rate of only seven percent.

Drug courts are cost-effective, too. According to the Utah State Court system, drug court treatment costs $7 a day. Again, the difference between drug court and traditional punishment is stark: it costs $70 per day to incarcerate someone in a state prison.

Rock and a Hard Place

Like most states, Utah faces budget problems forcing tough choices on policymakers. The Utah state prison system is facing $20 million in budget cuts that will require emergency releases of prisoners before the end of 2010, corrections executive director Tom Patterson told the state legislature.

There are currently more than 6,600 inmates in the state prison system; the state prison system is down to its last few remaining spaces for new prisoners.

Once the system reaches its limit, it will have to release a prisoner for every new inmate added, as required by state law.

Many observers wonder if it wouldn't be prudent for the legislature to act now to keep some low-level drug offenders out of prison, by revisiting the drug court reporting requirements that have hampered the ability of some courts to survive.

Drug and DUI courts are still open in Salt Lake City, Taylorsville, Riverdale, Davis County and Salt Lake County.

Legal Options Dwindling, Gardner Faces Firing Squad

Late Monday night, the Utah Supreme Court denied an appeal by Ronnie Lee Gardner, a condemned prisoner scheduled for execution by firing squad this Friday, June 18. The default method of execution in Utah is by lethal injection but prisoners are allowed a firing squad if they so choose.

In a 57-page ruling, the justices unanimously turned down Gardner's challenge to his death sentence. Associate Chief Justice Matthew B. Durrant wrote that Gardner's claims could have been raised more than a decade ago, and that he has been treated fairly throughout the course of his quarter-century of appeals.

Capital Murder Conviction

Gardner was convicted in 1985 for capital murder stemming from the fatal courthouse shooting of attorney Michael Burdell as Gardner was attempting escape during a hearing where he faced another murder charge.

The Utah Supreme Court said it wasn't persuaded by Gardner's argument that state law controlling when post-conviction appeals can be filed should be set aside in his case. The justices wrote that Utah courts have "endeavored scrupulously" to protect Gardner's rights. "We are firmly convinced that he has been treated justly and fairly," wrote Durrant in the ruling.

Challenge to Order to Carry Out Sentence Rejected

Last week, the justices upheld a lower court's ruling that Gardner couldn't challenge the order to carry out his death sentence, though he could challenge the sentence itself. Gardner's attorneys had asked the Supreme Court to reverse a state court's order of execution and instead impose a lifetime prison sentence.

Gardner was dealt a second blow on Monday when the Utah Board of Pardons and Parole denied his bid for clemency. Gardner's lawyers had argued Gardner suffered abuse as a child and, if allowed to live, would devote his remaining time to helping troubled kids.

He offered to turn over a 160-acre parcel of land in northern Utah to be turned into an organic farm and residential treatment center for victims of abuse. It's unknown at this point whether Gardner and his attorneys will file any more appeals, including one to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Legal to Carry Guns in National Parks, Illegal to Fire Them

You may have heard of a new law that went into effect at the end of February that reverses a complete ban on guns in national parks. Now, owners of properly permitted guns are allowed to carry their guns in the parks. What you may not have heard is that it remains illegal to shoot guns in national parks and national wildlife refuges.

The purpose of the new law is simple: to make it easier for gun owners with proper permits to travel between state and federal lands. The new law does not override federal anti-poaching laws. These laws prohibit discharging weapons and killing wildlife in national parks. Guns are also still banned from all federal buildings, including visitor centers and rangers' offices.

Burden on the Gun Owner to Research Local Laws

While the purpose of the law is simple, figuring out whether it is legal to take your gun into the park you're visiting is more complicated. Guns can be carried into the park if the owner has a valid gun permit from their home state and the state they are visiting recognizes the validity of that permit. Gun owners must confirm that their home state's permit will be recognized in any states in which they travel while visiting the national parks.

Gun owners should consider that some parks span more than one state. For example, Yellowstone National Park spans Montana, Wyoming and Idaho, and each of those states has its own gun laws. Gun owners are responsible for researching the laws of all states they will be visiting to ensure they follow all local laws.

The National Park Service still discourages people from bringing their weapons into parks. They remind gun owners that there are no self-defense provisions in the anti-poaching laws. Rather than a loaded and readily accessible weapon, park officials say the best line of defense against wild animals is to keep a safe distance from them. Visitors should hike in groups, make noise, and keep an eye out for animals. Bear spray has been proven to be a good final line of defense against a charging animal.

Check the Web site of the park you will be visiting for information on park policies and for links to state gun laws.

Permits for Utah's First General Statewide Turkey Hunt Available Now

The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources has announced that, for the first time, every hunter who wants to hunt wild turkeys in Utah can do so. Hunters no longer need a limited-entry permit to hunt wild turkeys this spring. Permits for Utah's first general statewide turkey hunt went on sale on February 16. The general turkey permits are not limited in number, so they will remain available until the season ends on May 31.

There will be two general hunts. The first hunt will be a special youth hunt held from April 30 to May 2. Hunters that are 15 years old and younger can participate in the youth hunt. Youth must have a general statewide hunting permit to participate.

The second hunt is open to anyone who buys a statewide general turkey permit and this hunt runs from May 3 to May 31. Kids who buy a permit for the youth hunt can also participate in the general statewide hunt.

Permits can be purchased at http://wildlife.utah.gov. They also can be purchased from Division of Wildlife Resources offices or from over 300 hunting license agents across Utah.

Some additional information relating to limited-entry permits:

  • Hunters who already obtained a limited-entry turkey permit cannot also purchase a general turkey permit (only one turkey permit per hunter a year)
  • Hunters who drew a limited-entry permit cannot participate in the youth hunt
  • Hunters will not lose any of their limited-entry turkey bonus points by buying a general turkey permit

If you have any other questions, you should call your local Division of Wildlife Resources office or DWR's Salt Lake City office at (801) 538-4700.

Greg Smith and Steven Russell, Criminal Law Attorneys

Laws affecting criminal cases can often change -- sometimes dramatically. Every year, state legislatures and judges make hundreds of decisions that impact the fate of suspects in criminal cases. At the law offices of Greg Smith and Steven Russell, Criminal Law Attorneys, we know how important it is to stay current with legal issues. We follow changes in the law -- legislated or decided at trial -- that will affect the strategies we use while defending you before prosecutors, judges and juries.

We know that keeping you informed about the legal process and relevant laws will help you make better decisions about your own case, whether you are accused of a violent crime, a business crime, a drug or alcohol-related crime, or simply disturbing the peace.

This blog page is intended to serve as a forum for discussing new legislation, case studies and relevant court decisions in criminal law in Utah. Periodically, we will update the information and blog topics, so please return often to see the most current posts and comments.

We are two dedicated lawyers operating independent law firms, located in the same building. We sometimes collaborate and sometimes just offer each other advice. Both of us place an emphasis on personalized attention and responsiveness to clients' concerns.

We respect your time and appreciate your interest in the Salt Lake City law offices of Greg Smith and Steven Russell, Criminal Law Attorneys. Your input is taken seriously. We invite your feedback about this and future blog posts on this page. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your specific legal needs. Thank you for visiting. Call us at 801-924-4934 or contact the law firm by e-mail to schedule a consultation.

Feedback from satisfied clients
  • "The domestic violence and DUI crimes that I was charged with would have ruined my career. Thank you for saving me! You are worth every penny I paid you."
  • "The domestic violence and DUI crimes that I was charged with would have ruined my career. Thank you for saving me! You are worth every penny I paid you."
more testimonials

Greg Smith and Steven Russell, Criminal Law Attorneys
180 S 300 W, Suite 170 :: Salt Lake City, UT 84101 :: Get Directions
Phone: 888-708-8867 :: 801-651-1512 :: Fax: 801-532-5178 :: E-mail the firm

Greg Smith and Steven Russell | Criminal Law Attorneys

FirmSite® by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.