Many Americans don’t realize it, but the United States locks up more of its own citizens than any other country. Incarceration seems to be the tool most favored by the criminal justice system, politicians and everyday taxpayers.
But what is prison really for? Most people would say it has three purposes: punishment, public safety and rehabilitation. The first two goals seem to be met by the current system. But what about the third? Close to half of all convicted inmates commit new crimes after being released and are back in prison within three years. The high recidivism rate suggests that the current prison model is ineffective, particularly in light of the billions of taxpayer dollars spent on incarceration each year.
Readers have no doubt heard about the most recent incident of school violence to make national news. The incident at a Pennsylvania high school earlier this week differs from other school violence cases in at least two ways.
The first is that the alleged attacker used a knife instead of guns, which is likely why fatalities were avoided. Second, the alleged attacker – a 16-year-old student of small physical stature – did not take his own life during the incident and will now face serious criminal charges. Whenever a teenager is accused of committing violent crime, there is one question that could significantly influence what happens to the defendant if convicted. That question is: Will the defendant be tried as a juvenile or as an adult?
There have been many cases over the years involving criminals who almost got away with their crimes but were eventually foiled by their own pride. They simply couldn’t help bragging about what they had done.
But what exactly constitutes a confession? This is one of many questions at the heart of a growing debate between prosecutors and civil rights advocates. Over the last couple years alone, there have been more than three dozen prosecutions around the U.S. in which rap lyrics written by amateur artists were used as evidence or otherwise played a prominent role.
There are many laws in this country that were established in an effort to protect children. Similarly, there are many laws in place that harshly punish those who are accused of harming a child in some way. While most of the time the line between appropriate behavior and inappropriate behavior is clear, there are some situations in which the line may become a little blury.
For instance, a Utah high school teacher has been accused of having an inappropriate sexual relationship with one of her students. According to news reports, the teacher and the 16-year-old student had sex multiple times over the course of several months. It appears, however, that the relationship was consensual.
Times are tight, which means that both businesses and the federal government are looking for ways to cut costs. Recently, Attorney General Eric Holder proposed a measure that could save billions of taxpayer dollars per year. More importantly, however, the move would provide some much needed criminal justice reform around the issue of drug crimes.
The United States incarcerates more of its own citizens than any other country in the world. Attorney General Holder recently noted that “although the United States comprises just five percent of the world’s population, we incarcerate almost a quarter of the world’s prisoners.” There are currently about 216,000 inmates in federal prison, and nearly half are there because of drug offenses. How much money could we save if we found alternatives to prison for non-violent offenders and decided to shorten unreasonably long sentences for drug crimes?
All Utah defendants are guaranteed the right to effective assistance of counsel under the U.S. Constitution's Sixth Amendment.
It is possible to appeal a Utah conviction if a defendant can show that their attorney provided ineffective assistance during a trial or plea negotiation.
When filing an appeal based on ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that his or her attorney performed deficiently and that this deficient performance prejudiced his or her defense.
It is somewhat uncommon for a criminal defendant in Utah to receive the maximum sentence for a crime.
Many crimes have the potential to carry lengthy sentences, but defendants routinely receive smaller sentences as a result of plea bargains and judicial discretion.
When multiple crimes are involved, it is possible for sentences to run at the same time (concurrently) or after each other (consecutively.) This means that it is possible for a defendant to spend a total of five years in prison for three five-year convictions, or a total of 15 years in prison for the same convictions.
A jury instruction can violate a defendant's due process rights when it receives prosecutors of their obligation to prove every essential element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
When reviewing appeals based on jury instructions, appeals courts determine whether a challenged jury instruction created a mandatory presumption or simply allowed a jury to draw a "permissive inference."
A Utah appeals court recently overturned the theft conviction of the Utah man, citing an erroneous jury instruction.
The defendant was Joseph Brandon Crowley, who was convicted of receiving stolen property and theft by deception. Investigators say that Crowley pawned an iPod which had been stolen from a car two weeks earlier.
Establishing a defendant's competency to stand trial is one of the foundational elements of a valid criminal conviction.
It is well established that Utah law requires that no person who is incompetent be tried for a public offense and that trying an incompetent person constitutes a due process violation.
One Utah man recently had his conviction overturned due to competency issues. The man is Mitchell Edward Wolf and he was convicted of stalking, making a terroristic threat and electronic communication harassment of his ex-partner.
Clients with disabilities or impairments
Access to our office is available to clients and their family members at all times. Special equipment and communication devices are available upon request for our clients with visual, hearing, speech and physical impairment. In addition, arrangements can be made for verbal or sign language interpreters if needed to communicate between our attorneys and the client and family. Please notify our law office if any additional accommodations related to your disability or impairment are necessary to make your consultation more comfortable.
I understand that I am contacting a
corporation, not an
individual, and that if I do business with the law firm, it will be with that corporation, not any individual(s). I understand that Greg Smith and Associates is
not the legal name of the law firm, rather, it is "Aafordable Legal Advocates, PC." I also understand that whatever may relate to, or arise out of, any communication with the law firm, which results in any type of legal action, such must be brought in the Third District Court of Utah, West Jordan Department, and that this is mandatory not permissive.